Why would trading for Marlon Mack solve anything?


En route to free agency, many Philadelphia Eagles fans eagerly awaited Howie Roseman to sign Marlon Mack.

On paper, it looked like a match made in heaven; Mack had played for Nick Sirianni throughout his tenure as offensive coordinator for the Indiana Colts, and after suffering a season-ending ACL injury in Week 1 of the 2020 NFL season, could likely be bought at cheap over a year, prove it.

In the worst case, Mack does not return to his vintage form and he is released.

Best case? The Eagles have the lightning thunder of Miles Sanders and could launch a balanced rush attack all over the running backs weathervane.

* spoiler alert * this did not happen. Mack resigned with the Colts on March 23, the Eagles drafted Kenneth Gainwell in the fifth round of the 2021 NFL Draft, and both teams continued to operate.

But now there’s a second chance to have Mack in a midnight green uniform, like he and the Colts have. would have agreed to “mutually seek an exchange” to move forward. Could the Philadelphia Eagles finally be the team to cede a conditional draft pick for his services? May be. Mack is a better player than Jordan Howard, a member of the practice squad, and the squad currently has no other power rusher on their active roster. But answer me first: why would trading for Marlon Mack solve anything?

The Philadelphia Eagles must commit to running the ball.

According to Statmuse, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers hold the record for the fewest rushed attempts in an NFL game at age five… wait, I wrote this before, here, actually.

If you’ve read anything about the Philadelphia Eagles’ Week 3 loss to the Dallas Cowboys in the past 24 hours, it certainly says something about how Nick Sirianni called just three points against his. running backs against 39 attempted passes. It surely also affected the fact that the team once again had an almost negative 10-minute possession time differential, that Jalen Hurts executed the ball nine times – some of them planned, some not – and that the team has largely committed an offense. devoid of creativity against one of the most powerful attacks in the league.

These stats are sort of the hits of the Eagles’ Week 3 obituary, with other smaller numbers like the team’s penalty count or their first disparity falling into “album track” territory. .

Could it be suggested that Sirianni doesn’t quite have a clear understanding of how to execute an NFL offense at this point in his career? Yes, some have done it here, actually.

So, guess this for me; if the Eagles seem even more disinterested in running the ball under Sirianni than Doug Pederson, why on earth would adding Mack to the fray make that any different?

Mack is no better rusher than Miles Sanders, not overall anyway. Even though Sanders has had a few issues with the drops over the summer, he’s still a better receiver than Mack likely ever will be and presents a host of fantastic opportunities to play both as a receiver and in the game. option set. While Mack may be a better rusher between tackles, given the Eagles are currently reduced to their second-string guards, it’s not like the team is going to be counting on a power play anytime soon.

While the sample size wasn’t particularly large, Gainwell also looked like a viable rusher with more options than Mack, who, again, is a fairly limited player at this point in his career. Gainwell looked good between tackles when given the chance, held up well in the run and is only scratching his surface as a receiving option out of the backfield.

What about Boston Scott? Well, Mack and Scott are basically the opposite in terms of playstyle, but considering the latter hasn’t received a single rushed attempt so far this season, it doesn’t really matter.

That’s where the problem lies, my friends, the Eagles don’t always use their running backs as running backs.

If Mack is so disheartened to receive just five rushing attempts against 13 offensive shots, he would hate being a member of the Eagles’ rushing corps as Scott, Gainwell and Sanders have only executed the ball 46 times against 187 offensive shots combined.

Just for context, Jonathan Taylor single-handedly ran the ball 42 times for 171, which is only 38 yards short of the Eagles’ running back combined total, but well above the 156 yards total. Sanders in 30 races.

… Wait, 171 divided by 42 is 4.07, while 156 divided by 30 is 5.2. You tell me that Sanders is actually a lot Following effective rusher than Taylor when he retrieves the ball? So why doesn’t Sirianni give him more hits if he could literally register a first down every two attempts on the ground?

* sigh * your guess is as good as mine.

Would a little fresh blood be all the Philadelphia Eagles backing corps needs to get started? Or maybe Nick Sirianni will see the error in his manners and present a balanced offensive attack in Week 4 when the Birds face Big Red and the Kansas City Cheifs at Lincoln Financial Field. Either way, it looks like the team’s depth chart will be the least of their worries going forward, as they can’t even properly use the players they already have under contract.


About Alexander Estrada

Check Also

Developers could have prevented 2022 crypto hacks if they had taken basic security measures

Users who lose funds due to malicious activity are virtually unheard of on Ethereum. In …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.